European International Arbitration Review (EIAR)
This journal is included in Arbitration Law's Full Subscription.
The European International Arbitration Review has a decidedly pan-Continental outlook with no emphasis on any one European jurisdiction. It has as its particular mission the provision of a forum for the expression of the rich tapestry of thought, practice, and jurisprudence that characterizes Europe. Under the direction of General Editor, Professor Franco Ferrari, the EIAR's new editorial board has taken the decision to begin publishing monothematic issues, thus allowing the audience to get an in-depth view of the status quo of a given topic. One of the EIAR's aims is to foster trans-regional dialogue. Since the EIAR's papers are not authored exclusively by European practitioners and scholars, readers will obtain a broad, international perspective on featured subjects.
The extraordinary diversity of European arbitration, both in law and practice, provides a never-ending and rich selection of issues for practitioners. The EIAR will constantly seek to examine and reflect this diversity.
*In addition to access to the complete EIAR archive, a subscription to EIAR includes archival access to all issues of the Stockholm Arbitration Report (SAR) and Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) – over 11 years of articles, arbitral awards, and court decisions, all provided with expert commentary and analysis.
Tables of Contents and articles from each EIAR issue are linked below:
Volume 9:2 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLES
The Law Governing the Liability of Arbitrators
Yağmur Hortoğlu
Applying the Rules Governing the Merits in International Commercial Arbitration
Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo
Inherent Powers of Arbitrators and Interim Measures
Andrea Carlevaris
Inherent Power of Arbitrators to Exclude Counsel?
Monique Sasson
Inherent Powers of Arbitrators to Deal with “Guerrilla Tactics”
Daniel Haue Jakobsson
Arbitrator’s Procedural Powers: The Last Frontier of Party Autonomy?
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo
When, Why and How Must Arbitrators Apply Overriding Mandatory Provisions? The Problems and a Proposal
Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo
Jura Novit Arbiter in the United States
Aaron D. Simowitz
Volume 9:1 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLES
Inherent Powers to Sanction Party Conduct
Maxi Scherer
Inherent Powers: Disclosure of Third Party Funders
Laurence Shore
Extension of Arbitration Agreements to Third Parties 2.0: Deconstruction, Evolution and Reconsideration
Mohamed S. Abdel Wahab
Developing Equipoise between Party-Autonomy and the Inherent Power of Arbitrator Discretion in the Gathering of Evidence in International Arbitration
Pedro J. Martínez-Fraga
Limits to Party Autonomy in the Composition of the Arbitral Panel
George A. Bermann
Party Autonomy in relation to Competence-Competence
Stefan Kröll
Limits to Party Autonomy at the Post-Award Stage
Maxi Scherer and Linda Silberman
Party Autonomy and Public Policy Awards by Consent
Domenico Di Pietro
Volume 8:2 2019
IMPACT OF EU LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
ARTICLES
EU Law and Consumer Arbitration
Camelia Toader
Arbitration and Anti-suit Injunctions under EU Law
Alexander Layton
The Transformation of the European Court of Justice and Arbitration Referrals
Jürgen Basedow
EU Overriding Mandatory Law and the Applicable Law on the Substance in International Commercial Arbitration
Xandra Kramer
EU Overriding Mandatory Provisions and the Law Applicable to the Merits
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
The European Convention on Human Rights and Arbitration: The EU Law Perspective
Massimo V. Benedettelli
Volume 8:1 2019
LIMITS TO PARTY AUTONOMY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
ARTICLES
Limits to Party Autonomy and Institutional Rules
Andrea Carlevaris
Party Autonomy, the “Right” to Appoint, and the Rise of Strategic Challenges
Brian King
Party Autonomy and the Rules Governing the Merits of the Dispute in Commercial Arbitration
Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo
Limits to Party Autonomy, Good Faith, Fair Dealing and International Commercial Arbitration
Filip De Ly
Limits to Party Autonomy Imposed by European Mandatory Law
Inka Hanefeld
Limits to Party Autonomy to Protect Weaker Parties in International Arbitration
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Volume 7:2 2018
SOFT LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE, Franco Ferrari, General Editor
Articles
Soft Law in Arbitration: For Uniformity or For Diversity, Flexibility and Choice?
Gary F. Bell
The Hardening of Soft Law in International Arbitration
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Procedural Soft Law in International Arbitration: Resolving the Tension between Flexibility and Predictability
Ian Ming Choo
Soft Law and Arbitral Procedure: A Conditioned But Inescapable Couple
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo
The Role of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in Determining the Law Applicable to the Merits in Commercial Arbitration
Franco Ferrari
Storing Clouds in a Jar: Lex Mercatoria, Soft Law and Codification in Transnational Commercial Law
Marco Torsello
Allocation of Damages in International Arbitration: Is There a Room for Soft Law Rules?
Caroline Kleiner
Reviewing the Use of “Soft Law” in Investment Arbitration
José E. Alvarez
Soft Law as a Replacement or Corrective of National Law in Investment Arbitration?
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
Volume 7:1
CONFLICT OF LAWS IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
PDF of Title Page and T.O.C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR'S NOTE - Franco Ferrari, General Editor
ARTICLES
The Law Applicable to Legal Privilege in International Commercial Arbitration
Friedrich Rosenfeld
The Law Governing Counsel’s Ethical Obligations in International Arbitration
Margie-Lys Jaime
The Effect of Overriding Mandatory Rules on the Arbitration Agreement
Karsten Thorn and Moritz Nickel
Conflict of Laws in the Arbitration of IP Disputes
Hosna Sheikhattar and Alexander Odle
Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration
George A. Bermann
The Law Governing Res Judicata
Silja Schaffstein
Conflict of Laws and International Investment Arbitration
Jan Asmus Bischoff
Volume 6:2
PDF of Title Page and T.O.C
INHERENT POWERS OF ARBITRATORS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR'S NOTE - Franco Ferrari, General Editor
ARTICLES
Sources of Inherent Powers
Andrea K. Bjorklund and Jonathan Brosseau
Inherent Powers to Streamline the Proceedings
Inka Hanefeld and Aaron de Jong
Inherent Powers and Competition Law
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
The Use of Inherent Powers by Arbitrators to Protect the Public at Large
Hattie Middleditch
The Inherent Powers of International Adjudicators to Reconsider and Revise Their Decisions
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Volume 6:1
IURA NOVIT CURIA AND THE POWER OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD - Klaus Reichert, S.C., Former General Editor
EDITOR'S NOTE - Franco Ferrari, General Editor
ARTICLES
Iura Novit Arbiter in Argentine Arbitration Law
Julio César Rivera Jr.
Iura Novit Arbiter in Danish Arbitration Law
Joseph M. Lookofsky and Clement Salung Petersen
Jura Novit Curia in International Commercial Arbitration – the German Perspective
Burkhard Hess and Leon Marcel Kahl
The Incidence of Iura Novit Arbiter in Singapore Arbitration Law
Koh Swee Yen and Kenny Lau
Jura Novit Arbiter in Swedish Arbitration Law
James Hope and Elisabet Hallberg
Iura Novit Arbiter in Swiss Arbitration Law
Andrea Bonomi and David Bochatay
Iura Novit Curia in International Law
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Volume 5:2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PUBLISHER’S NOTE - Michael Kitzen, Editor in Chief, JURIS
ARTICLES
The TTIP Investment Court System: An Evolution of Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Joanna G. Coyne
The Misdiagnosed Investment Court: The Wrong Remedy for the Right Problem
Joshua B. Simmons
European Union Law as a Jurisdictional and Substantive Defense in Investor-State Arbitration
George A. Bermann
An Opaque Blacklist: The Lack of Transparency in Identifying Non-Cooperating Countries under the EU IUU Regulation
Eva Romée van der Marel
Maritime Boundary Delimitation Agreements in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea
Nicholas A. Ioannides
Volume 5:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Classic Disputes: Arbitration of Disputes in Classical Music
Don Erik Franzen
Emergency Arbitrators: Promises, Challenges and Possibilities
Clyde W. Lea
Tribunal Bias in African Arbitrations
Harry Matovu QC
Brexit Is Irrelevant to the Future of Arbitration in Switzerland
Charles Poncet
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
France
Genentech: EU Law Confronted with International Arbitration
Paschalis Paschalidis
Arbitration Rules’ Binding Force and Challenge of Arbitrators, Some Useful Clarifications: Société Tecnimont Spa v. SA J.&P. Avax
Clément Fouchard
Decision: Société Tecnimont Spa v. SA J.&P. Avax Case No. 14/14884, April 12 2016
Switzerland
Waiver of Right to Challenge an International Arbitral Award Is Not Incompatible with ECHR: Tabbane v. Switzerland
Catherine A. Kunz
Decision: Tabbane v. Switzerland (Tabbane Noureddine c. Suisse) Case No. 41069/12, March 1 2016
Volume 3:2
Volume 3:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR'S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Commentary to: "The 'Social' Dilemma of Section 1782:
How I Learned to Start Litigating and Love the Bomb"
Ugo Draetta
The "Social" Dilemma of Section 1782: How I Learned to Start
Litigating and Love the Bomb
Karl Hennessee
The Arbitrator Was Late by One Day and His Jurisdiction Expired
Charles Poncet
State Immunity in Selected Countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Justinas Jarusevicius, Anastasia Rodionova, Artis Straupenieks and
Jakub Wolkowicz
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
Ireland
Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. OAO Tomskneft VNK [2014] IEHC 115
Nicola Dunleavy, Gearoid Carey, Maria Kennedy
Decision: Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. OAO Tomskneft VNK
[2014] IEHC 115
Germany
(In)Voluntary Submission to Arbitration in Germany, Switzerland
and Beyond
Heiner Kahlert
France
Paris Court of Appeal, 10 April 2014, Pôle 1, Chamber 1,
RG N°13/13075
Thomas Voisin
Decision: Paris Court of Appeal, 10 April 2014, Pôle 1, Chamber 1,
RG N°13/13075
Volume 2:2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Commentary to: “Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in International Construction Contracts: Commercial or Investment Arbitration?”
Ugo Draetta
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in International Construction Contracts: Commercial or Investment Arbitration?
Edoardo Marcenaro
The Cultural Impact on Arbitration in Europe: Is There Need to Bridge the Cultural Gap?
Sergei Gorbylev
What Now for Article 16(3)?
Doug Jones
__________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
__________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES
Portugal
Portuguese Court of Arbitration for Sports: Constitutional Award No. 781/2013 of November 20, 2013
Antonio Júdice Moreira
Constitutional Award No. 230/2013 of April 24, 2013
Constitutional Award No. 781/2013 of November 20, 2013
Volume 2:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Commentary to: “Users Need More Transparency in International Arbitration”
Ugo Draetta
Users Need More Transparency in International Arbitration
Michael McIlwrath and Roland Schroeder
Confidentiality in Arbitration—A Tale of Doves, Chromatics and European Divides
Heiner Kahlert
The Tobacco Wars: How Big Tobacco Is Using Investor-State Arbitration to Combat State Regulation and a Lesson for Europe
Eric Kar-Yan Ng
The Paris Arbitration Rules: Towards a Simplified Arbitral Procedure
Hinda Rabkin
__________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
England
The English High Court Addresses the Intention of the Parties to Arbitrate
Jonathan Toffolo
Lisnave Estaleiros Navais SA v. Chemikalien Seetransport GmbH [2013] EWHC 338 (Comm)
Israel
Foreign Arbitral Awards and Res Judicata in Israel
Shai Sharvit
Gad Chemicals Ltd. v. BIP Chemicals Ltd. and others
[unpublished decision]
Volume 1:2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Introductory Note: A Corporate Counsel View on International Arbitration
Ugo Draetta
An In-house Counsel Perspective on the Promotion of International Commercial Arbitration
Edoardo Marcenaro
Playing by the Rules in International Arbitration: What Are the Rules?
James Hope
Unifying the Legislative Regime for Domestic and International Arbitration in Ireland
Paul Gallagher S.C. and Francis Kieran
Recent Developments in Hungarian Arbitration Law: A Cause for Concern
Orsolya Toth, Balázs Sahin-Tóth and Imre Kása
_________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic: Farewell to Czech Private Arbitration Centers
Rostislav Pekař and Mária Lokajová
Resolution of the Supreme Court No. 32 Cdo 2282/2008 dated
31 July 2008
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 32 Cdo 2312/2007 dated
21 January 2009
Decision of the Prague High Court No. 12 Cmo 496/2008 dated
25 May 2009
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23 Cdo 5129/2007 dated
29 September 2009
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23 Cdo 4895/2009 dated
28 April 2010
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23 Cdo 2672/2008 dated
29 April 2010
Resolution of the Supreme Court No. 31 Cdo 1945/2010 dated
11 May 2011
Decision of the Czech Constitutional Court No. II ÚS 3057/10
dated 5 October 2011
Decision of the Czech Constitutional Court No. II ÚS 2164/10
dated 1 November 2011
Russia
The End of Indirect Claims in Russia?
Michael Wietzorek
Stena RoRo AB v. OAO Baltiyskiy zavod, Supreme Arbitrazh Court,
13 September 2011, No. VAS-1795/2011
Stena RoRo AB v. OAO Baltiyskiy zavod, Supreme Arbitrazh Court,
13 September 2011, No. VAS-9899/2009
OAO Holdingovaya Kompaniya “Sibirskiy Cement”, OOO Finansovo-promyshlennyy soyuz “Sibkonkord”& İstanbul Çimento Yatırımları Anonim Şirketi v. Ciments Français, Supreme Arbitrazh
Court, 5 June 2012, No. VAS-76/2012
Volume 1:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITORIAL
Klaus Reichert, General Editor
ARTICLES
The New York Convention: Can We Finally Move Forward from 1958 to 1953?
Marike R.P. Paulsson
Annex: Hypothetical Draft Convention on the International Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Awards
Albert Jan van den Berg
Investment Insurance and Investment Arbitration: The Position of the Third Party
Amy Sander
The Independence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport
Charles Poncet
What Does "Ethics in Arbitration" Really Mean?
Ugo Draetta
_________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
West Tankers v. Allianz (The Front Comor) [2012] EWCA Civ 27
Crispin Winser
Decision: West Tankers v. Allianz (The Front Comor) [2012] EWCA Civ 27 83
French Courts Confirm and Extend the Autonomy of International Arbitration Emily Fox
Decision: Elf Aquitaine and Total v. Mattei and others, French Supreme Court, 12 October 2011
Decision: Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation v. National Gas Company, Paris Court Of Appeal, 24 November 2011
Interpretation of Arbitral Agreements by German Courts
Sebastian D. Müller
Decision: Federal Court Of Justice, Decision Dated 14 July 2011, Published In Schiedsvz 2011
Spanish Court Rejects Application for Advanced Examination and Seizure of Evidence in Aid of a Foreign Arbitration
Félix J. Montero Muriel and María Rivera-Lupu
_____________________________________________________________________________
General Editor
Volumes 6 and 7
Franco Ferrari is a Professor of Law and the Director of the Center for Transnational Litigation, Arbitration and Commercial Law at New York University School of Law. Prof. Ferrari joined NYU on a full-time basis in September 2010, after serving as visiting professor for various years. Previously, he was chaired professor of comparative law at Tilburg University in the Netherlands and Bologna University as well as professor of international law at Verona University in Italy. After serving as member of the Italian Delegation to various sessions of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) from 1995 to 2000, he served as Legal Officer at the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, International Trade Law Branch (2000-2002), with responsibility for numerous projects, including the preparation of the UNCITRAL Digest on Applications of the UN Sales Convention (2004 edition). Prof. Ferrari has published more than 280 law review articles in various languages and 18 books in the areas of international commercial law, conflict of laws, comparative law and international commercial arbitration. He is a member of the editorial board of various peer reviewed European law journals (Internationales Handelsrecht, European Review of Private Law, Contratto e impresa, Contratto e impresa/Europa, Revue de droit des affaires internationales). He also acts as arbitrator both in international commercial arbitrations and investment arbitrations.
Volumes 1 and 5
Klaus Reichert SC specialises in international arbitration and has worked on, both as lead counsel and as arbitrator (frequently as chair), in excess of 250 international disputes right across a broad spectrum of complex subject matters, industries and governing laws involving parties (often sovereigns, or state-owned commercial entities) from all over the World. He has particular experience arising from multiple cases administered by ICSID, ICC, LCIA, ICDR and the PCA. He has sat in most of the major arbitral venues with a significant focus on cases located in the United States.. He is a member of the Court of Arbitration for Sport and the International Basketball Federation (BAT) panel of arbitrators.
Article Editors
Andrea Carlevaris
andrea.carlevaris@sciencespo.fr
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
Oslo University School of Law
giuditta.cordero-moss@jus.uio.no
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo
Sciences Po Law School
diego.fernandezarroyo@sciencespo.fr
Stefan Kröll
Bucerius Law School
stefan.kroell@law-school.de
Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio
Complutense University of Madrid
pdmigue@der.ucm.es
Colm Ó hOisín, S.C.
Law Library, Dublin
colm@colmohoisinsc.ie
Monique Sasson
Jams
msasson@jamsinternational.com
Case Note Editors
Jan Asmus Bischoff
M.M.Warburg & CO
JBischoff@mmwarburg.com
Vladimir Pavić
Belgrade University Faculty of Law
pavic@ius.bg.ac.rs
Francesca Ragno
Verona University School of Law
francesca.ragno@univr.it
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Hanefeld Rechtsanwälte
rosenfeld@hanefeld-legal.com
Nathalie Voser
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd / Attorneys at Law
nathalie.voser@swlegal.ch
Graduate Editors
Ellen C. Campbell
New York University
ecc415@nyu.edu
Mary Grace White
New York University
mgw277@nyu.edu
Hattie Middleditch
New York University
hrm318@nyu.edu
Laura E. Wolfe
New York University
laura.wolfe@law.nyu.edu
General Editor
Volumes 6 and 7
Franco Ferrari is a Professor of Law and the Director of the Center for Transnational Litigation, Arbitration and Commercial Law at New York University School of Law. Prof. Ferrari joined NYU on a full-time basis in September 2010, after serving as visiting professor for various years. Previously, he was chaired professor of comparative law at Tilburg University in the Netherlands and Bologna University as well as professor of international law at Verona University in Italy. After serving as member of the Italian Delegation to various sessions of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) from 1995 to 2000, he served as Legal Officer at the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, International Trade Law Branch (2000-2002), with responsibility for numerous projects, including the preparation of the UNCITRAL Digest on Applications of the UN Sales Convention (2004 edition). Prof. Ferrari has published more than 280 law review articles in various languages and 18 books in the areas of international commercial law, conflict of laws, comparative law and international commercial arbitration. He is a member of the editorial board of various peer reviewed European law journals (Internationales Handelsrecht, European Review of Private Law, Contratto e impresa, Contratto e impresa/Europa, Revue de droit des affaires internationales). He also acts as arbitrator both in international commercial arbitrations and investment arbitrations.
Volumes 1 and 5
Klaus Reichert SC specialises in international arbitration and has worked on, both as lead counsel and as arbitrator (frequently as chair), in excess of 250 international disputes right across a broad spectrum of complex subject matters, industries and governing laws involving parties (often sovereigns, or state-owned commercial entities) from all over the World. He has particular experience arising from multiple cases administered by ICSID, ICC, LCIA, ICDR and the PCA. He has sat in most of the major arbitral venues with a significant focus on cases located in the United States.. He is a member of the Court of Arbitration for Sport and the International Basketball Federation (BAT) panel of arbitrators.
Article Editors
Andrea Carlevaris
andrea.carlevaris@sciencespo.fr
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
Oslo University School of Law
giuditta.cordero-moss@jus.uio.no
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo
Sciences Po Law School
diego.fernandezarroyo@sciencespo.fr
Stefan Kröll
Bucerius Law School
stefan.kroell@law-school.de
Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio
Complutense University of Madrid
pdmigue@der.ucm.es
Colm Ó hOisín, S.C.
Law Library, Dublin
colm@colmohoisinsc.ie
Monique Sasson
Jams
msasson@jamsinternational.com
Case Note Editors
Jan Asmus Bischoff
M.M.Warburg & CO
JBischoff@mmwarburg.com
Vladimir Pavić
Belgrade University Faculty of Law
pavic@ius.bg.ac.rs
Francesca Ragno
Verona University School of Law
francesca.ragno@univr.it
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Hanefeld Rechtsanwälte
rosenfeld@hanefeld-legal.com
Nathalie Voser
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd / Attorneys at Law
nathalie.voser@swlegal.ch
Graduate Editors
Ellen C. Campbell
New York University
ecc415@nyu.edu
Mary Grace White
New York University
mgw277@nyu.edu
Hattie Middleditch
New York University
hrm318@nyu.edu
Laura E. Wolfe
New York University
laura.wolfe@law.nyu.edu
Tables of Contents and articles from each EIAR issue are linked below:
Volume 9:2 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLES
The Law Governing the Liability of Arbitrators
Yağmur Hortoğlu
Applying the Rules Governing the Merits in International Commercial Arbitration
Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo
Inherent Powers of Arbitrators and Interim Measures
Andrea Carlevaris
Inherent Power of Arbitrators to Exclude Counsel?
Monique Sasson
Inherent Powers of Arbitrators to Deal with “Guerrilla Tactics”
Daniel Haue Jakobsson
Arbitrator’s Procedural Powers: The Last Frontier of Party Autonomy?
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo
When, Why and How Must Arbitrators Apply Overriding Mandatory Provisions? The Problems and a Proposal
Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo
Jura Novit Arbiter in the United States
Aaron D. Simowitz
Volume 9:1 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLES
Inherent Powers to Sanction Party Conduct
Maxi Scherer
Inherent Powers: Disclosure of Third Party Funders
Laurence Shore
Extension of Arbitration Agreements to Third Parties 2.0: Deconstruction, Evolution and Reconsideration
Mohamed S. Abdel Wahab
Developing Equipoise between Party-Autonomy and the Inherent Power of Arbitrator Discretion in the Gathering of Evidence in International Arbitration
Pedro J. Martínez-Fraga
Limits to Party Autonomy in the Composition of the Arbitral Panel
George A. Bermann
Party Autonomy in relation to Competence-Competence
Stefan Kröll
Limits to Party Autonomy at the Post-Award Stage
Maxi Scherer and Linda Silberman
Party Autonomy and Public Policy Awards by Consent
Domenico Di Pietro
Volume 8:2 2019
IMPACT OF EU LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
ARTICLES
EU Law and Consumer Arbitration
Camelia Toader
Arbitration and Anti-suit Injunctions under EU Law
Alexander Layton
The Transformation of the European Court of Justice and Arbitration Referrals
Jürgen Basedow
EU Overriding Mandatory Law and the Applicable Law on the Substance in International Commercial Arbitration
Xandra Kramer
EU Overriding Mandatory Provisions and the Law Applicable to the Merits
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
The European Convention on Human Rights and Arbitration: The EU Law Perspective
Massimo V. Benedettelli
Volume 8:1 2019
LIMITS TO PARTY AUTONOMY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
ARTICLES
Limits to Party Autonomy and Institutional Rules
Andrea Carlevaris
Party Autonomy, the “Right” to Appoint, and the Rise of Strategic Challenges
Brian King
Party Autonomy and the Rules Governing the Merits of the Dispute in Commercial Arbitration
Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo
Limits to Party Autonomy, Good Faith, Fair Dealing and International Commercial Arbitration
Filip De Ly
Limits to Party Autonomy Imposed by European Mandatory Law
Inka Hanefeld
Limits to Party Autonomy to Protect Weaker Parties in International Arbitration
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Volume 7:2 2018
SOFT LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE, Franco Ferrari, General Editor
Articles
Soft Law in Arbitration: For Uniformity or For Diversity, Flexibility and Choice?
Gary F. Bell
The Hardening of Soft Law in International Arbitration
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Procedural Soft Law in International Arbitration: Resolving the Tension between Flexibility and Predictability
Ian Ming Choo
Soft Law and Arbitral Procedure: A Conditioned But Inescapable Couple
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo
The Role of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in Determining the Law Applicable to the Merits in Commercial Arbitration
Franco Ferrari
Storing Clouds in a Jar: Lex Mercatoria, Soft Law and Codification in Transnational Commercial Law
Marco Torsello
Allocation of Damages in International Arbitration: Is There a Room for Soft Law Rules?
Caroline Kleiner
Reviewing the Use of “Soft Law” in Investment Arbitration
José E. Alvarez
Soft Law as a Replacement or Corrective of National Law in Investment Arbitration?
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
Volume 7:1
CONFLICT OF LAWS IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
PDF of Title Page and T.O.C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR'S NOTE - Franco Ferrari, General Editor
ARTICLES
The Law Applicable to Legal Privilege in International Commercial Arbitration
Friedrich Rosenfeld
The Law Governing Counsel’s Ethical Obligations in International Arbitration
Margie-Lys Jaime
The Effect of Overriding Mandatory Rules on the Arbitration Agreement
Karsten Thorn and Moritz Nickel
Conflict of Laws in the Arbitration of IP Disputes
Hosna Sheikhattar and Alexander Odle
Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration
George A. Bermann
The Law Governing Res Judicata
Silja Schaffstein
Conflict of Laws and International Investment Arbitration
Jan Asmus Bischoff
Volume 6:2
PDF of Title Page and T.O.C
INHERENT POWERS OF ARBITRATORS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR'S NOTE - Franco Ferrari, General Editor
ARTICLES
Sources of Inherent Powers
Andrea K. Bjorklund and Jonathan Brosseau
Inherent Powers to Streamline the Proceedings
Inka Hanefeld and Aaron de Jong
Inherent Powers and Competition Law
Giuditta Cordero-Moss
The Use of Inherent Powers by Arbitrators to Protect the Public at Large
Hattie Middleditch
The Inherent Powers of International Adjudicators to Reconsider and Revise Their Decisions
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Volume 6:1
IURA NOVIT CURIA AND THE POWER OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD - Klaus Reichert, S.C., Former General Editor
EDITOR'S NOTE - Franco Ferrari, General Editor
ARTICLES
Iura Novit Arbiter in Argentine Arbitration Law
Julio César Rivera Jr.
Iura Novit Arbiter in Danish Arbitration Law
Joseph M. Lookofsky and Clement Salung Petersen
Jura Novit Curia in International Commercial Arbitration – the German Perspective
Burkhard Hess and Leon Marcel Kahl
The Incidence of Iura Novit Arbiter in Singapore Arbitration Law
Koh Swee Yen and Kenny Lau
Jura Novit Arbiter in Swedish Arbitration Law
James Hope and Elisabet Hallberg
Iura Novit Arbiter in Swiss Arbitration Law
Andrea Bonomi and David Bochatay
Iura Novit Curia in International Law
Friedrich Rosenfeld
Volume 5:2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PUBLISHER’S NOTE - Michael Kitzen, Editor in Chief, JURIS
ARTICLES
The TTIP Investment Court System: An Evolution of Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Joanna G. Coyne
The Misdiagnosed Investment Court: The Wrong Remedy for the Right Problem
Joshua B. Simmons
European Union Law as a Jurisdictional and Substantive Defense in Investor-State Arbitration
George A. Bermann
An Opaque Blacklist: The Lack of Transparency in Identifying Non-Cooperating Countries under the EU IUU Regulation
Eva Romée van der Marel
Maritime Boundary Delimitation Agreements in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea
Nicholas A. Ioannides
Volume 5:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Classic Disputes: Arbitration of Disputes in Classical Music
Don Erik Franzen
Emergency Arbitrators: Promises, Challenges and Possibilities
Clyde W. Lea
Tribunal Bias in African Arbitrations
Harry Matovu QC
Brexit Is Irrelevant to the Future of Arbitration in Switzerland
Charles Poncet
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
France
Genentech: EU Law Confronted with International Arbitration
Paschalis Paschalidis
Arbitration Rules’ Binding Force and Challenge of Arbitrators, Some Useful Clarifications: Société Tecnimont Spa v. SA J.&P. Avax
Clément Fouchard
Decision: Société Tecnimont Spa v. SA J.&P. Avax Case No. 14/14884, April 12 2016
Switzerland
Waiver of Right to Challenge an International Arbitral Award Is Not Incompatible with ECHR: Tabbane v. Switzerland
Catherine A. Kunz
Decision: Tabbane v. Switzerland (Tabbane Noureddine c. Suisse) Case No. 41069/12, March 1 2016
Volume 3:2
Volume 3:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR'S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Commentary to: "The 'Social' Dilemma of Section 1782:
How I Learned to Start Litigating and Love the Bomb"
Ugo Draetta
The "Social" Dilemma of Section 1782: How I Learned to Start
Litigating and Love the Bomb
Karl Hennessee
The Arbitrator Was Late by One Day and His Jurisdiction Expired
Charles Poncet
State Immunity in Selected Countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Justinas Jarusevicius, Anastasia Rodionova, Artis Straupenieks and
Jakub Wolkowicz
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
Ireland
Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. OAO Tomskneft VNK [2014] IEHC 115
Nicola Dunleavy, Gearoid Carey, Maria Kennedy
Decision: Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. OAO Tomskneft VNK
[2014] IEHC 115
Germany
(In)Voluntary Submission to Arbitration in Germany, Switzerland
and Beyond
Heiner Kahlert
France
Paris Court of Appeal, 10 April 2014, Pôle 1, Chamber 1,
RG N°13/13075
Thomas Voisin
Decision: Paris Court of Appeal, 10 April 2014, Pôle 1, Chamber 1,
RG N°13/13075
Volume 2:2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Commentary to: “Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in International Construction Contracts: Commercial or Investment Arbitration?”
Ugo Draetta
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in International Construction Contracts: Commercial or Investment Arbitration?
Edoardo Marcenaro
The Cultural Impact on Arbitration in Europe: Is There Need to Bridge the Cultural Gap?
Sergei Gorbylev
What Now for Article 16(3)?
Doug Jones
__________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
__________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES
Portugal
Portuguese Court of Arbitration for Sports: Constitutional Award No. 781/2013 of November 20, 2013
Antonio Júdice Moreira
Constitutional Award No. 230/2013 of April 24, 2013
Constitutional Award No. 781/2013 of November 20, 2013
Volume 2:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Commentary to: “Users Need More Transparency in International Arbitration”
Ugo Draetta
Users Need More Transparency in International Arbitration
Michael McIlwrath and Roland Schroeder
Confidentiality in Arbitration—A Tale of Doves, Chromatics and European Divides
Heiner Kahlert
The Tobacco Wars: How Big Tobacco Is Using Investor-State Arbitration to Combat State Regulation and a Lesson for Europe
Eric Kar-Yan Ng
The Paris Arbitration Rules: Towards a Simplified Arbitral Procedure
Hinda Rabkin
__________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
England
The English High Court Addresses the Intention of the Parties to Arbitrate
Jonathan Toffolo
Lisnave Estaleiros Navais SA v. Chemikalien Seetransport GmbH [2013] EWHC 338 (Comm)
Israel
Foreign Arbitral Awards and Res Judicata in Israel
Shai Sharvit
Gad Chemicals Ltd. v. BIP Chemicals Ltd. and others
[unpublished decision]
Volume 1:2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITOR’S NOTE
Klaus Reichert S.C., General Editor
ARTICLES
Introductory Note: A Corporate Counsel View on International Arbitration
Ugo Draetta
An In-house Counsel Perspective on the Promotion of International Commercial Arbitration
Edoardo Marcenaro
Playing by the Rules in International Arbitration: What Are the Rules?
James Hope
Unifying the Legislative Regime for Domestic and International Arbitration in Ireland
Paul Gallagher S.C. and Francis Kieran
Recent Developments in Hungarian Arbitration Law: A Cause for Concern
Orsolya Toth, Balázs Sahin-Tóth and Imre Kása
_________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John P. Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy L. Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic: Farewell to Czech Private Arbitration Centers
Rostislav Pekař and Mária Lokajová
Resolution of the Supreme Court No. 32 Cdo 2282/2008 dated
31 July 2008
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 32 Cdo 2312/2007 dated
21 January 2009
Decision of the Prague High Court No. 12 Cmo 496/2008 dated
25 May 2009
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23 Cdo 5129/2007 dated
29 September 2009
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23 Cdo 4895/2009 dated
28 April 2010
Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23 Cdo 2672/2008 dated
29 April 2010
Resolution of the Supreme Court No. 31 Cdo 1945/2010 dated
11 May 2011
Decision of the Czech Constitutional Court No. II ÚS 3057/10
dated 5 October 2011
Decision of the Czech Constitutional Court No. II ÚS 2164/10
dated 1 November 2011
Russia
The End of Indirect Claims in Russia?
Michael Wietzorek
Stena RoRo AB v. OAO Baltiyskiy zavod, Supreme Arbitrazh Court,
13 September 2011, No. VAS-1795/2011
Stena RoRo AB v. OAO Baltiyskiy zavod, Supreme Arbitrazh Court,
13 September 2011, No. VAS-9899/2009
OAO Holdingovaya Kompaniya “Sibirskiy Cement”, OOO Finansovo-promyshlennyy soyuz “Sibkonkord”& İstanbul Çimento Yatırımları Anonim Şirketi v. Ciments Français, Supreme Arbitrazh
Court, 5 June 2012, No. VAS-76/2012
Volume 1:1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EDITORIAL
Klaus Reichert, General Editor
ARTICLES
The New York Convention: Can We Finally Move Forward from 1958 to 1953?
Marike R.P. Paulsson
Annex: Hypothetical Draft Convention on the International Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Awards
Albert Jan van den Berg
Investment Insurance and Investment Arbitration: The Position of the Third Party
Amy Sander
The Independence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport
Charles Poncet
What Does "Ethics in Arbitration" Really Mean?
Ugo Draetta
_________________________________________________________
CASE NOTES EDITORIAL
John Gaffney, Case Notes Editor
Timothy Foden, Assistant Case Notes Editor
CASE NOTES
West Tankers v. Allianz (The Front Comor) [2012] EWCA Civ 27
Crispin Winser
Decision: West Tankers v. Allianz (The Front Comor) [2012] EWCA Civ 27 83
French Courts Confirm and Extend the Autonomy of International Arbitration Emily Fox
Decision: Elf Aquitaine and Total v. Mattei and others, French Supreme Court, 12 October 2011
Decision: Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation v. National Gas Company, Paris Court Of Appeal, 24 November 2011
Interpretation of Arbitral Agreements by German Courts
Sebastian D. Müller
Decision: Federal Court Of Justice, Decision Dated 14 July 2011, Published In Schiedsvz 2011
Spanish Court Rejects Application for Advanced Examination and Seizure of Evidence in Aid of a Foreign Arbitration
Félix J. Montero Muriel and María Rivera-Lupu
_____________________________________________________________________________