Inherent Powers: Disclosure of Third Party Funders - European International Arbitration Review (EIAR) - Volume 9 - Issue 1
Originally from European International Arbitration Review
Preview Page
I. Sources Consulted and Abbreviations Used in this Article
A. Cases
(1) RSM Production Corporation v. Saint Lucia, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/10, Decision on Saint Lucia’s Request for Security for Costs (Aug. 13, 2014) (“RSM”);
(2) EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/14, First Session and Hearing on Provisional Measures (Mar. 17, 2014) (“EuroGas I”);
(3) EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/14, Award (Aug. 18, 2017) (“EuroGas II”);
(4) Guaracachi America, INC. and Rurelec PLC v. the Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2011-17, Procedural Order No. 13 (Feb. 21, 2013) (“Guaracachi”);
(5) Muhammet Çap Sehil Inşaat Endustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/6, Decision on Respondent’s Objection to Jurisdiction under Article VII(2) of the Turkey-Turkmenistan Bilateral Investment Treaty (Feb. 13, 2015) (“Muhammet Cap I”);
(6) Muhammet Çap Sehil Inşaat Endustri ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/6, Procedural Order No. 3 (June 12, 2015) (“Muhammet Cap III”);
(7) Sergei Vitkorovich Pugachev v. the Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, Interim Award (July 7, 2017) (“Pugachev”);
(8) South American Silver Limited (Bermuda) v. the Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2013-15, Procedural Order No. 7 (July 21, 2015) (“South American Silver I”);
(9) South American Silver Limited (Bermuda) v. the Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2013-15, Procedural Order No. 10 (Jan. 11, 2016) (“South American Silver II”); and
(10) First Nat’l Bank of Chicago v. Mottola, 302 F. Supp. 785, 791-92 (N.D. Ill., 1969) (First Nat’l Bank of Chicago).