|Help

Court Decisions

COMMENTS ON THE SWEDISH SUPREME COURT’S RECENT JUDGMENT ON THE SO-CALLED “DOCTRINE OF ASSERTION” AND THE ARBITRATORS’ JURISDICTION IN INVESTMENT DISPUTES - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2008 No. 3
Paulo Fohlin
PDF | October 2009
June 2014
DECISION OF THE SWEDISH SUPREME COURT, JUDGMENT RENDERED 28 MARCH 2008 IN CASE NO. T 2113-06, “THE PETROBART CASE” - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2008 No. 3
PDF | December 2011
June 2014
SUPREME COURT (HOGE RAAD), THE NETHERLANDS DECISION ON 5 DECEMBER 2008 CASE NO. C07/166HR (LJN: BF3799; NJ 2009, 6) - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2009 No. 1
PDF | February 2010
June 2014
DECISION OF THE AMSTERDAM COURT OF APPEAL RENDERED ON APRIL 28 2009 IN CASE NO. 200.005.269/01 “YUKOS CAPITAL S.A.R.L. vs. OAO ROSNEFT” - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2009 No. 1
Eric A. Schwartz
PDF | February 2010
June 2014
COURT OF APPEAL OF QUEBEC DECISION IN CASE NO: 500-09-016097-057 ON MARCH 11, 2008 “Smart Systems Technologies Inc. vs. Domotique Secant Inc.” - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2009 No. 1
PDF | February 2010
June 2014
ALBERTA COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN CASE NO: 0701-0230-AC ON AUGUST 5, 2008 “YUGRANEFT CORPORATION VS. REXX MANAGEMENT CORPORATION” - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2009 No. 1
Gerald W. Ghikas
PDF | February 2010
June 2014
DECISION BY THE SWEDISH SVEA COURT OF APPEAL ON DECEMBER 12, 2009 IN CASE NO T 4548-08 “Systembolaget AB VS. V&S Vin & Sprit AB” - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2009 No. 2
PDF | July 2011
June 2014