|Help

Court Decisions

PACIFICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. V. BOOK: U.S. SUPREME COURT COMPELS ARBITRATION OF RICO CLAIMS, ALTHOUGH ARBITRATOR AUTHORITY MAY BE LIMITED - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 2, No. 2
S. Stephen Yau
PDF | March 2003
December 2017
THE BLACK SHEEP OF THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURTS: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION IN TING V. AT&T SIGNALS A WIN FOR CONSUMERS -
Jacqueline Angela Simms
PDF | March 2003
December 2017
HOWSAM V. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECIDES THAT ARBITRATORS, NOT THE COURTS, DETERMINE PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS UNDER THE NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 2, No. 1
William Parker Sanders
PDF | March 2003
December 2017
PULTE HOME CORP. V. SMITH: COURTS MUST ANALYZE EACH CLAIM IN A MULTICLAIM PETITION FOR ARBITRABILITY - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 2, No. 1
Amanda F. Spain
PDF | March 2003
December 2017
MITCHELL V. AMERICAN FAIR CREDIT ASS'N: CONSUMERS MUST HAVE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION PROVISIONS IN A NEW CONTRACT FOR IT TO BE ENFORCEABLE - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 2, No. 1
Marla Owczarek
PDF | March 2003
December 2017
GULF GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE CO. V. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.: THE FIFTH CIRCUIT STAYS OUT OF THE DETAILS OF ARBITRATION - Journal of American Arbitration
Nahom Gebre
PDF | March 2003
December 2017
WELBORN CLINIC V. MEDQUIST, INC.: DOES BROAD INTERPRETATION CALL FOR A BOILERPLATE PROVISION? - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 2, No. 1
Mona Gupta
PDF | March 2003
December 2017