Carolyn B. Lamm
![](https://arbitrationlaw.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/default_images/default_profile_photo_1.png?itok=cjX9bwF7)
701 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
United States
White & Case LLP, Partner 1984-Present; White & Case LLP, Partner Committee, 2007-2011; Trial Attorney, Fraud Section, Civil Division, US Department of Justice (under the Attorney General’s Honors Program), 1973-1977; Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation, Civil Division, US Department of Justice, 1977-1980.
American Bar Association, President, 2009-2010; District of Columbia Bar, President, 1997-1998; American Arbitration Association, Executive Committee and Board, 2000-Present; American Law Institute, 1995-Present; ALI Council, 2000-Present; ALI Advisory Committee for the Restatement of Law of International Arbitration; ALI Counselor for the Restatement Fourth of Foreign Relations Law; American Uzbekistan Chamber of Commerce, Chairman of the Board, 2010-Present; American Turkish Council, Executive Committee; American Indonesian Chamber of Commerce, Board Member; ICCA, Governing Board.
ICSID Panel of Arbitrators, designated by the United States (1995-2001); by the Republic of Uzbekistan (2001-Present); ICDR/AAA International.
Counsel in International Arbitrations at ICSID, ICC, LCIA, ICSID Additional Facility, ICDR, AAA International Rules, Stockholm Chamber, Vienna Center, UNCITRAL, Ad Hoc; Geneva Chamber of Commerce and Industry; service as party-appointed, sole arbitrator or chairman in international arbitrations before ICSID, ICSID Additional Facility (NAFTA Dispute involving Canadian Claimant), ICDR/AAA, Dubai Center; service as witness on international arbitration and international law issues is ICSID.
Numerous articles on international arbitration, private international law; Carolyn Lamm and Eckhard Hellbeck (Washington, DC) co-authored “US Court of Appeals Vacates BG Group’s Investment Treaty Award Against Argentina for Failure to Litigate in Argentine Courts for 18 Months Before Commencing Arbitration,” a comment on the recent decision of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Republic of Argentina v. BG Group Plc., 665 F.3d 1363 (D.C.Cir. 2012). The comment was published in International Arbitration Law Review; Carolyn Lamm, Eckhard Hellbeck and Bjoern Boerger (Washington, DC) co-authored a case note in International Arbitration Law Review on the decision of the US District Court for the District of Columbia in Continental Transfert Technique Ltd v. Federal Government of Nigeria, Civ. No. 08-2026 (PLF), 2011 WL 3319407 (D.D.C. Aug. 3, 2011). In that case, the court enforced a Nigerian arbitral award both directly, under the New York Convention, and indirectly, through enforcement of an English judgment enforcing the award, as a “foreign-money judgment” under the DC Uniform Foreign-Money Judgment Recognition Act.