|Help

SCC Case O53/2005 - Chapter 14 - SCC Arbitral Awards: 2004-2009

Author(s): 
Carita C. H. Wallgren-Lindholm
Mari Antila
Eric M. Runesson
Page Count: 
34 pages
Media Description: 
PDF from "SCC Arbitral Awards: 2004-2009"
Published: 
January, 2011
Jurisdictions: 
Latvia,
Sweden,
International
Practice Areas: 
Arbitrators and Arbitral Tribunals,
Capacity and Qualifications of Arbitrators,
Applicable Law,
Arbitral Awards,
Dissenting and Separate Opinions,
Agreement to Arbitrate
Author Detail: 

Carita Wallgren-Lindholm, Partner, Law firm Lindholm Wallgren, Attorneys Ltd, Helsinki, Finland.

Mari Antila, Legal Counsel, Law firm Lindholm Wallgren, Attorneys Ltd, Helsinki, Finland.

Eric M. Runesson, Professor adjunct and partner at Lawfirm Sandart & Partners, Stockholm, Sweden.

PDF207.88 KB

$40.00
Description: 

Originally from SCC Arbitral Awards 2004-2009

Preview Page

 

XIV. FINAL AWARD RENDERED IN 2006 IN SCC EXPEDITED ARBITRATION O53/2005

Subject Matter:

The law applicable to determining the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal when Respondent in liquidation invokes non-arbitrability inter alia under its national legislation.

Finding:

The law of the seat of arbitration – the seat was fixed by an arbitral institution (the SCC Institute) – applies when determining the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal. The law of the Respondent’s country shall not be taken into consideration for this purpose.

Table of Contents: 

XIV. SCC CASE O53/2005
SUBJECT-MATTERS:
The law applicable to determining the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal when Respondent in liquidation invokes non-arbitrability inter alia under its national legislation.
Observations by Carita Wallgren-Lindholm and Mari Antila
Observations by Eric M. Runesson