|Help

BLURRING THE LINE BETWEEN ARBITRATION AND LITIGATION: CALIFORNIA COURT HOLDS THAT PARTIES CAN EXPLICITLY CONTRACT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ARBITRATOR'S DECISION IN BAIZE V. EASTRIDGE COS., L.L.C. - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 6, No. 1

Author(s): 
Christine Prokopick
Page Count: 
13 pages
Published: 
March, 2007
Jurisdictions: 
United States
Practice Areas: 
Authority of the Arbitral Tribunal,
Arbitrators and Arbitral Tribunals,
Court Decisions,
Dispute Resolution & Litigation,
Arbitral Awards

PDF140.7 KB

$40.00
Description: 

Originally from Journal of American Arbitration (JAA)

Preview Page

I. OVERVIEW 

II. BACKGROUND 

A. The Limits of Judicial Review under the Federal Arbitration Act 

B. The Federal Courts’ Approach to Whether Parties Can Contract for Judicial Review of Arbitrator’s Decisions 

C. California’s Approach to Whether Parties Can

Contract for Judicial Review of an Arbitrator’s Award 

III.     THE COURT’S DECISION 

IV.    ANALYSIS 

V. CONCLUSION