THE WYOMING SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT THE COURT, RATHER THAN THE ARBITRATOR, SHOULD DECIDE WHETHER THERE HAS BEEN FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT OF A CONTRACT IN FOX V. TANNER - Journal of American Arbitration (JAA) - Vol. 4, No. 1

Author(s): 

Gregory M. Alvarez

Page Count: 

4 pages

Published: 

March, 2005

Jurisdictions: 

United States

Practice Areas: 

Authority of the Arbitral Tribunal,

Arbitrators and Arbitral Tribunals,

Court Decisions

Subscribe to download

PDF103.69 KB

$40.00

Add to cart

Description: 

Originally from Journal of American Arbitration (JAA)

Preview Page

I.  OVERVIEW 

II.  THE COURT’S DECISION