X. GmbH v. Y. GmbH & Co KG [The German Biomass Power Plant] No. 4A_428/2010 - Swiss International Arbitration Law Reports (SIALR) - 2010 Vol. 4 Nos. 1 & 2
Page Count:
20 pages
Media Description:
1 PDF Download
Published:
November, 2013
Practice Areas:
Description:
Originally from:
Swiss International Arbitration Law Reports 2010 Vol. 4 Nos. 1 and 2
Preview Page
No. 43
X. GmbH v. Y. GmbH & Co KG
[The German Biomass Power Plant]
No. 4A_428/2010
Headnote
■ Called upon to adjudicate claims between two members of a
consortium, an arbitrator does not exceed his jurisdiction by dealing
with possible claims by third parties against the consortium where
the determination of those claims arises as a preliminary question.
■ According to the rules of good faith, objections to arbitral
jurisdiction must be raised as soon as possible (confirmation of
previous decisions).
■ The maxim ne eat iudex ultra petita partium is not breached where
an arbitrator gives the claim in dispute a legal characterisation
which is wholly or partly at variance with the characterisation made
by the parties in their submissions, as long as the arbitrator’s
characterisation is covered by, and does not exceed, the parties’
prayers for relief (confirmation of previous decisions).
■ The parties have no constitutional right to present their case
specifically in relation to the legal characterisation of the facts which
is to be made by the arbitrator. However, the parties have such a
right where the arbitrator intends to rest his decision on a legal
ground on which neither party has relied in the proceedings and the
relevance of which could not be reasonably anticipated
(confirmation of previous decisions).
Summary of the Decision
X. GmbH entered into a consortium agreement with Y. GmbH & Co
KG. The consortium undertook as the general contractor to build a
biomass power plant for Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH. Technical
difficulties and delays arose in the course of the erection works.
Y. GmbH & Co KG brought an arbitration against X. GmbH claiming
damages. X. GmbH contested the claim and made a counter-claim.
An ICC tribunal granted part of the claim made by Y. GmbH & Co KG
(paragraph 1 of the operative part of the award) and part of the counterclaim
made by X. GmbH (paragraph 2 of the operative part of the award).
Each party was ordered to bear a share in the costs to the extent of its
success (paragraphs 3 – 6 of the operative part of the award).