I regret that I am unable to concur with the conclusions of the Tribunal contained in the Dispositif of the Award or to agree, in general, with the reasoning deployed by the majority to arrive at those conclusions. Indeed, and I say this with great respect to my learned colleagues, I find the underlying logic of the Award singularly unpersuasive (let alone convincing), self-contradicting, result-oriented, in many respects cavalier, insufficiently critical and unsupported by evidence, and indeed flying in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence. In other words very similar to the ABC Experts’ Report itself and like it as far in excess of mandate as it is removed from historical (and contemporary) reality. I must therefore dissent.