|Help

MR. WILLIAM NAGEL (UNITED KINGDOM) v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC DECISION BY THE SVEA COURT OF APPEAL (SWEDEN) RENDERED ON 26 AUGUST 2005 - Stockholm International Arbitration Review (SIAR) 2006 No. 2

Author(s): 
Michael Polkinghorne
Matthew Secomb
Page Count: 
18 pages
Media Description: 
1 PDF Download
Published: 
March, 2007
Jurisdictions: 
Czech Republic,
United Kingdom,
Sweden
Practice Areas: 
Court Decisions,
Authority of the Arbitral Tribunal,
Arbitral Decisions

PDF627.23 KB

$40.00
Description: 

Originally from: Stockholm International Arbitration Revie

Preview Page
 
Includes Observations by Michael Polkinghorne & Matthew Secomb
 
MR. WILLIAM NAGEL (UNITED KINGDOM) v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC DECISION BY THE SVEA COURT OF APPEAL (SWEDEN) RENDERED ON 26 AUGUST 2005
 
Subject Matters:
(1) Did the Arbitral Tribunal rule on all of the issues that were submitted to it?
(2) Was the decision taken by the Arbitral Tribunal a jurisdictional decision, or a decision on the substance of the parties’ dispute?
 
Findings:
(3) The Arbitral Tribunal had effectively dealt with all of the points submitted to it.
(4) The Arbitral Tribunal had made a substantive assessment and a final ruling on the substance of the matter.
 
Parties:
Plaintiff: Mr William Nagel
Respondent: The Czech Republic
Counsel:
Plaintiff: Mr Paolo Fohlin and Mr Jonas Rosengren, Members of the Swedish Bar
Respondent: Mr Dag Wersén, Member of the Swedish Bar
 
Court: The Svea Court of Appeal, Sweden