1. In its communication of 28 April 2014, the Respondent raised several complaints in respect of the Claimant's compliance with the Tribunal's rulings on confidentiality. It submitted the table provided in Procedural Order No. 6 in which it challenged the Claimant's confidentiality designations, explaining why each of the designations was inappropriate. In its communication of 5 May 2014, the Claimant commented on the Respondent's complaints. It responded to each of the Respondent's challenges in the same table. This Order deals with various issues arising out of the Parties' submissions.
II. THE REQUESTS
A. DESIGNATIONS IN THE CLAIMANT'S AMENDED MEMORIAL
1. The Respondent's position
2. The Respondent submits that on 16 December 2013, the Tribunal had struck each of the Claimant's Restricted Access designations that appeared in a 23-page section of the Claimant's Memorial. Despite this, in its amended Memorial, the Claimant maintained 18 Restricted Access designations. Accordingly, the Respondent informed the Tribunal that it had proceeded on the basis that the information in question was not Restricted Access vis-a-vis the Respondent, but was Restricted Access vis-a-vis the Claimant.