Petitioner Raymond Loewen seeks to have this Court vacate a unanimous arbitration award rendered by a Tribunal of three eminent jurists under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) through procedures he selected. Notably, he has already made the same arguments that he now raises before this Court to the Tribunal itself in an improper attempt to have that panel reconsider his claims. Having been rebuffed in that attempt, he now attacks that Tribunal as careless, unethical, and dishonest. Mr. Loewen's arguments, ad hominem or otherwise, fail to survive even casual scrutiny, let alone satisfy the high standard necessary to vacate a final arbitration award.