CHAPTER 22 - Japan - Interim Measures in International Arbitration
Author(s):
Hiroyuki Tezuka
Yoko Maeda
Page Count:
26 pages
Media Description:
1 PDF Download
Published:
May, 2014
Jurisdictions:
Practice Areas:
Tags:
Description:
Originally from: Interim Measures in International Arbitration
Preview Page
RELIEF PROVIDED BY COURTS
1. (a) Are courts authorized to issue orders of attachment,
injunctions or other provisional orders with respect to
arbitration proceedings?
Yes they are.
Art. 15 of the Japanese arbitration law (Chusai-Ho, Law No. 138
of 2003, the “Arbitration Law”), which is essentially based on Art. 15
of the UNCITRAL Model Law (“Model Law”), states “It is not
incompatible with an arbitration agreement for a party to request,
before or during arbitral proceedings, from a court an interim measure
or protection and for a court to grant such measure in respect of any
civil dispute which is the subject of the arbitration agreement.”
Therefore, Japanese court may issue provisional orders available under
Civil Provisional Remedies Act, Law No. 91 of 1989 (“CPRA”) with
respect to arbitration proceedings.
(b) If so, please describe the nature of any such provisional
relief that is available.
A court in Japan may issue (i) an order of provisional seizure
(which is similar to an attachment) and (ii) an order of provisional
disposition (which is similar to an injunction).
Order of Provisional Seizure (karisashiosae)
An order of provisional seizure may be issued when there is a
likelihood that it will be impossible or extremely difficult to carry out
compulsory execution for a claim for payment of money (Art. 20 of
CPRA. An order of provisional seizure may be against real property,
movables and claims.