The Changing Landscape of International Oil & Gas Arbitration - Chapter 01 - Leading Practitioners’ Guide to International Oil & Gas Arbitration
Author(s):
James M. Gaitis
Page Count:
22 pages
Media Description:
1 PDF Download
Published:
August, 2015
Description:
Originally from The Leading Practitioners' Guide to International Oil & Gas Arbitration
Preview Page
I. INTRODUCTION
Some international arbitration specialists would argue that
international oil and gas arbitration is not a separate legal discipline
that warrants its own treatment. They might observe that although
the subject matter of oil and gas arbitrations differs from that
involved in other arbitrations, the same may be said of arbitrations
involving other industry sectors. In furtherance of their objections,
they might also emphasize that at least as of the publication of this
work, there are no separate arbitral rules designed specifically for use
in arbitrations involving oil and gas subject matter and, with one
nascent exception, that no separate arbitral institutions exist solely for
that purpose. And yet the fact is that there has been considerable
movement toward recognizing oil and gas arbitration, or at least its
broader cousin—international energy arbitration—as a separate
discipline and, hence, the creation of the Energy Charter Treaty
(ECT) and, more recently, the International Centre for Energy
Arbitration in Scotland.
Despite such debates, it is clear that there is ample reason for
treating international oil and gas arbitration as a separate and distinct
subject, including the fact that the increasing number of investorstate
and commercial oil and gas arbitrations, and the magnitude of
the monetary claims involved in those arbitrations, has given rise to a
sophisticated and experienced community of oil and gas arbitration
practitioners who can rightly claim to work in a highly specialized
field. And that field is transitioning at a remarkably rapid pace.
Evolving influences and developments in the field of
international oil and gas arbitration take many forms. Some relate
specifically to the variables that endlessly cause change in the milieu
in which the oil and gas industry operates: constant and inevitable
advancements in oil and gas technology, unpredictable fluctuations in
the marketplace for petroleum products, enhanced public attention to
environmental and social concerns, new governmental regulations
and political objectives that often are more reactive than prescient,
increasingly complicated changes in contracting practices and risk
allocation, changes in corporate personalities, and so on. Other
influences and developments affecting international oil and gas
arbitration are associated with the ongoing proliferation of
multilateral and bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and, just as
important, the rapidly growing body of arbitral jurisprudence and
scholarly commentary relating to those treaties. And still others relate
to the establishment of an increasing number of arbitral institutions,
whose rules, too, have evolved to address a broad variety of
procedural and practical concerns.