By accepting the entries of two athletes for both Slalom and Giant Slalom, SLOC induced them to prepare and train for both disciplines for which they were properly entered. To exclude them from competing in these two disciplines a few days before the events would be unfair and contrary to the doctrine of “estoppel by representation” which CAS applies as a general principle of law (“An estoppel that arises when one makes a statement or admission that induces another person to believe something and that results in that person’s reasonable and detrimental reliance on the belief”). Given the interaction of the International and National Federations with the Organizing Committees of Olympic Games (SLOC), both the athletes and the NOC which entered them are entitled to rely on the acts and omissions of SLOC as if they were acts or omissions of FIS.