IN VIEW OF 

- Procedural Orders No. 27 of 30 May 2014, No. 28 of 9 June 2014 and No. 29 of 10 June 2014, as well as the documents and correspondence referred to therein; 

- Respondent’s letter of 10 June 2014 sent to the Arbitral Tribunal directly; 

- Claimants’ letter of 10 June 2014 sent to the Arbitral Tribunal directly; 

CONSIDERING 

- that, in its letter of 10 June 2014, Respondent raised the following issues: 

(i) Respondents objects to the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision to call Prof. Edwards, notably because, according to Respondent, the Arbitral Tribunal should have then also called Prof. Stiglitz who discusses the same issues as Prof. Edwards;