1. Respondent’s letter dated 26 February 2014, in which Respondent requested the Arbitral Tribunal “to order Claimants to produce forthwith a number of exhibits and legal authorities referred to in the expert reports accompanying Claimants’ Reply Memorial on Phase 2” and listed them in a Table attached to the letter;
2. Claimants’ answer dated 28 February 2014, in which Claimants demand that Respondent’s requests be rejected.
3. that Respondent’s requests relate either to specific sources mentioned in relevant expert reports or underlying spreadsheets or other ‘executable files’ further explaining the experts’ calculations or reasoning;