Selecting the Site for Arbitration - Chapter I.4 - Practitioner's Handbook On International Arbitration And Mediation- 3rd Edition
James H. Carter is a Partner in the New York office of Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP and is co-head of its global arbitration practice. Mr. Carter is a widely recognized authority on international arbitration, with 40 years of experience as arbitrator or counsel in more than 100 cases He is former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the American Arbitration Association; past President of the American Society of International Law (ASIL), former member of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), member of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, and past Chair of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association, the International Law Committee and the International Dispute Resolution Committee of the New York State Bar Association, and the International Affairs Council of the New York City Bar Association.
Originally from Practitioner's Handbook On International Arbitration And Mediation- 3rd Edition
This chapter explains the importance of, and the considerations underlying, the selection of the site for an arbitration. The site can affect the selection of the arbitrator, the procedural law governing the arbitration, the discovery available in the proceedings, the enforcement of the choice-of-law clause, the costs of the arbitration (including the requirement, and thus the expense, of retaining local counsel), the availability of resources (both the facilities and translators), and the enforceability of the resulting arbitral award. The chapter also briefly surveys the leading sites for arbitrations.
§ 4.01 Introduction: The Importance of the Site
Practitioner's Hint: The selection of the site of arbitration is probably the second most important decision in an arbitration because a number of other factors may well be influenced by that choice. That conclusion suggests the following: choose the site carefully.
As suggested in chapter 2, selection of the arbitral site may be the second most important decision following the choice of the arbitrator(s) in preparing for an international arbitration. While there is no uniformly "best" site for international arbitration, the parties should bear in mind many factors besides the physical convenience of the site when selecting the site for arbitration. Note the following factors which can affect the selection of the site:
(a) the selection of the sole or presiding arbitrator,
(b) the enforcement of the parties' choice-of-law clause,
(c) the procedural law governing the arbitration,
(d) the discovery procedures available for the arbitration, and
(e) the enforcement of the arbitral award.
Those factors are relevant particularly in an international arbitration where relatively little time may be spent at the actual site of the arbitration. Preliminary hearings may be held by telephone or at some place other than the arbitration site; discovery may involve production of documents from the parties' files, wherever they may be located, with copies shipped to opposing counsel; and witness statements may be prepared at various places and submitted to the arbitrators and opposing counsel electronically or by mail.
§ 4.01 Introduction: The Importance of the Site
[1] Site Selection: Impact on Pool of Arbitrators
[2] Site Selection: Impact/Effect on Choice of Law
[3] Site Selection: Impact on Procedural Law
[4] Site Selection: Impact on Discovery
[5] Site Selection: Impact on Enforceability of Award
[6] Costs
§ 4.02 Factors to Weigh in Selecting a Site
[1] Whether the State is a Signatory to an Arbitral Enforcement Convention
[2] Identity of the Parties and Nature of the Transaction
[a] Common Law or Civil Law Parties
[b] Language
[c] Nature of the Transaction
[3] Pool of Arbitrators
[4] Relevance of a "Neutral" Forum
[5] Scope of Review of Arbitral Awards
[6] Convenience
[7] Resources
[8] Other Considerations of Local Law and Practice
[9] Considerations Involving Civil Law and Common Law Jurisdictions
§ 4.03 Sites to Consider and Their Legal Frameworks
[1] New York (and other U.S. venues)
[2] London
[3] Switzerland
[4] Paris
[5] Stockholm
[6] Other European Venues
[a] Germany
[b] The Netherlands
[c] Austria
[d] Belgium
[7] Asia: Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sydney and Others
[a] Singapore
[b] Hong Kong
[c] People's Republic of China
[d] Australia
[e] Tokyo
[f] Kuala Lumpur
[8] Canada
[9] Latin America
§ 4.04 How Arbitral Institutions Can Help Select a Site