Originally from Dispute Resolution Journal

The author shares how he planned for his transition from being an attorney in an active law practice to being a “full-time” neutral. Along the way he raises issues that those on the same path are likely to face.

In the interest of full disclosure I should admit that I “transitioned” into the role of neutral following my early retirement at age 60 from a very fulfilling, full-time law practice. I have spoken to many folks who have traveled the retirement path and I can tell you that, like snowflakes, no two transitions are alike. For example, about 10 years ago, one of my former partners began talking of becoming a neutral. While still practicing law, he sought out arbitrators to discuss his entrance to the field, took ADR courses and joined the American Arbitration Association’s roster of neutrals. But when the firm’s retirement age of 65 required him to leave, he joined a national labor law firm that had no mandatory retirement policy. When I asked him about his previously expressed intent to become a neutral, he said, “I have to be busy.” I surmised that his change of heart was based on the fact that during the past two or three years, being busy was not my problem. This he well knew, since I candidly told him I was not busy whenever he asked. I understand he is very happy with his decision to continue full-time law practice, while I am content with my choice.

So while my experience may not resonate with every attorney who is considering becoming a neutral, it may be helpful to those who follow through.