Originally from Czech and Central European Yearbook of Arbitration - 2012: Party Autonomy versus Autonomy of Arbitrators

All quoted rulings and rationes have been made anonymous to the maximum possible extent. To this end, rationes and explanations have been considerably abbreviated and modified. For the sake of anonymity, some data may have been deliberately altered, where such changes have no effect on the legal pertinence of the analysis of the specific issue expressed, in particular, by legal sentences. Quotes and annotations relating to judicial practice are non-binding and cannot be construed as a reference to a law source or an obligatory interpretation of the law. Further, legal opinions voiced by arbitrators are, as a rule, of an individual nature, and arbitration courts composed of different arbitrators may come to significantly different conclusions. Moreover, the quoted rulings of [state] courts cannot be considered a binding legal source in the Czech Republic, even though their considerable importance for the standardization of the current legal practice cannot be denied.