Resource Nationalism, Expropriation and Risk Mitigation - Chapter 02 - Leading Practitioners’ Guide to International Oil & Gas Arbitration
Author(s):
Elisabeth Eljuri
Gustavo Mata
Page Count:
56 pages
Media Description:
1 PDF Download
Published:
August, 2015
Description:
Originally from The Leading Practitioners' Guide to International Oil & Gas Arbitration
Preview Page
I. INTRODUCTION
Resource nationalism is a state’s somewhat understandable desire
to make the most out of the natural resources located within its
territory. Some states accomplish this feat by implementing changes
to taxation or royalty regimes and restrictions on foreign investment.
However, other states adopt more aggressive approaches and decide
to expropriate the investments of foreign investors, or altogether
nationalize an entire sector of their economy. Evidently, resource
nationalism is most present in the energy sector, where investors face
the constant risk of being subject to resource nationalist policies
which might adversely affect the terms under which they initially
decided to make their investment. Expropriation, in its different
forms and shapes, is the most common manifestation of resource
nationalism, and as such, it will be thoroughly discussed in this paper.
II. RESOURCE NATIONALISM
Resource nationalism has been at the center of many ideological,
political and economic debates. As a result, it has become a
somewhat controversial term, which can be defined quite differently
depending on which side of the debate an author stands. For
instance, some define resource nationalism as the expression, by
states, of their determination to gain the maximum national
advantage from the exploitation of national resources.1 Such
definition is in line with the International Energy Forum’s own
effort, which concluded that resource nationalism is simply nations
wanting to make the most of their endowment.2
Some authors find that resource nationalism has part of its cause
in anti-Western sentiment of resource-rich developing countries
against economic globalization and the Western IOCs3 and even a
political antipathy to the USA (and by implication its oil companies).4
Others, like Jeffrey Wilson, have tailored more complex
definitions and have arrived at the conclusion that resource
nationalism embodies an inherently state-directed and mercantilistic
approach to the management of natural resources.5 According to
approach to the management of natural resources.5 According to