Originally from Dispute Resolution Journal

In the following article, Ira Lobel and Brian Lobel compare and contrast some of the basic rules of labor relations to those of international relations. They show that many of the lessons that have been learned in the labor field can be transferred to the international arena. At the very least, they feel it is important to recognize and identify the similarities and differences between the two areas, in the hope that this may serve to increase the potential for success in international negotiations.

One of the outgrowths of September 11 has been a renewed interest in international relations and international negotiations. As we are engaged in a multifaceted effort to control terrorism and to bring peace to the Middle East, it may be helpful to identify some of the similarities and differences between these types of international negotiations and other negotiations.

This article aims to draw comparisons between labor and international negotiations. Many of the lessons negotiators and mediators have learned over the years in labor relations have yet to be learned in the international arena. Others simply may not be applicable.

Power, Timing, and Information

It has been said that the dynamics of labor relations is governed by three elements: power or leverage of the parties; timing; and available information. During the course of a labor dispute, the decision-making process can be modified by changes in any one or all three of these elements.