Discovery In Commercial Arbitration: How Arbitrators Think - Dispute Resolution Journal - Vol. 63, No. 3
Charles J. Moxley Jr. is Of Counsel to Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, specializing in complex litigation and arbitration, and an adjunct professor of law at Fordham Law School. He is co-chair of the Legislation Committee of the New York State Bar Association’s Dispute Resolution Section and regularly serves as an arbitrator and mediator. He has served on the American Arbitration Association’s Panel of Commercial Arbitrators for over 25 years. He can be reached at cmoxley@kaplanfox.com.
Originally from Dispute Resolution Journal
When a case has been filed in federal or state court, litigators generally have a good idea of what discovery will be allowed. Federal and state rules of civil procedure set forth the standards for discovery in litigation, and a large body of case law elaborates on these standards.
Do we have anything similar in arbitration? Can counsel and the parties know with reasonable certainty how much discovery will be allowed in their commercial arbitration? What kind of discovery is typically permitted? Are the answers to these questions entirely within the discretion of the arbitrator? Is there a governing standard?
Given the confidentiality of arbitration, there are generally no published arbitral decisions on discovery questions in arbitration. So in this article I set forth some tentative answers to these questions in the context of domestic commercial arbitration based on my personal experience as an arbitrator in over 125 commercial cases, the varied experience of arbitrators with whom I have served. I also discuss the relevant rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and other arbitration institutions, as well as the treatment of discovery in the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (RUAA).