Mitchell L. Lathrop

Computer Technology in Civil Litigation, Bancroft-Whitney, 1990; Insurance Coverage for Environmental Claims, LexisNexis Matthew Bender (updated annually);“Excess Umbrella and Reinsurance Issues in Environmental Cases,” Defense Research Institute, October, 1988; “The Environmental Engineer as an Expert in Litigation,” Proceedings 44th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, (1989), reprinted in 2 Env. Claims Jour. 65 (1989); “Disputes Between Direct Insurers,” Practicing Law Institute, 1990; “Insuring Environmental Risks,” Business Insurance Law and Practice, Matthew Bender, 1990; “Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Immunity in Insurance Coverage Litigation,” Defense Research Institute, 1990; “Excess Insurance and Insurance Coverage Litigation,” American Bar Association, Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee, March, 1993; “Reinsurance,” Defense Research Institute, October, 1993;“What Every Lawyer Ought to Know about Reinsurance (But Too Few Do)!” San Diego County Bar Association, Insurance/Bad Faith Section, June, 1995; “Mediating Reinsurance Insolvency Disputes,” American Bar Association Section of Business Law, June, 1996; “Insolvency and Reinsurance:  The Search for Assets and the Battle for the Funds,” New York State Bar Reinsurance Litigation and Arbitration Program, November, 1996; “Trigger of Coverage and Allocation of Losses Between Reinsurers and Cedents,” Reinsurance Association of America, Environmental Conference, January, 1997; “Insurance Implications of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,” Zurich Reinsurance Centre, Inc., Conference on Emerging Issues in the Professional Liability Arena, January,  1997; “Private Cleanup Cost Recovery and Compliance with the National Contingency Plan,” Environmental Claims Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pg. 59, Winter, 1998; “Insurance Implications of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,” 1 Jour. Ins. Coverage 30 (1998); “The Changing Face of Expert Evidence,” 52 F.D.C.C. Quarterly 409 (2002); “Interim Awards and Freezing Assets,” International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (January 2007); “A Comparative Look at International Arbitral Rules and Statutes,” Center for International Legal Studies (February 2007); “Subtle Differences: A Look at Some Widely Used Arbitral Rules,” International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (May 2007); “Court-ordered Interim Measures in Aid of the Enforceability of Pending Foreign Arbitration,” Journal of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (July 2007); “Responsive Pleadings and Arbitration,” Alternatives to Litigation, 2010; “Widely Used Rules in International Arbitration,” International Dispute Resolution, Kluwer Law International, 2010; “Jurisdiction Issues in International Arbitration,” Global Business Law Review, 2 Global Bus. L. Rev. 29 (2012); “The State of the Law: Responsive Pleading, and Motions to Compel Arbitration,” Alternatives, Vol. 30 (February 2012)